<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Casual Blog &#187; Miscellaneous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/category/miscellaneous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog</link>
	<description>I&#039;m Tim and this is my blog. I just started a year-long trip around the world on 7/1/08.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>For Sale: 1996 Nissan Maxima SE</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/06/maxima/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/06/maxima/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m selling a 1996 Nissan Maxima SE. It&#8217;s black with a black leather interior, has 163k miles, and runs perfectly. It&#8217;s got a sun roof, ABS, Bose stereo (with CD), power everything.
I&#8217;ve owned this car since 2000, and the only bad thing that&#8217;s ever happened to me was a flat tire once. I&#8217;ve had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/forsale/maxima/CRW_4281.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="CRW_4281" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/forsale/maxima/CRW_4281.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>I&#8217;m selling a 1996 Nissan Maxima SE. It&#8217;s black with a black leather interior, has 163k miles, and runs perfectly. It&#8217;s got a sun roof, ABS, Bose stereo (with CD), power everything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve owned this car since 2000, and the only bad thing that&#8217;s ever happened to me was a flat tire once. I&#8217;ve had a few sensors replaced as well, to quiet a check engine light, but it&#8217;s never left me stranded. This is a smooth dependable ride for short commutes and long drives. I&#8217;m only selling it because I&#8217;m going to travel for a year, and don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth paying to put the car in storage.</p>
<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/forsale/maxima/CRW_4288.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="right" alt="CRW_4288" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/forsale/maxima/CRW_4288.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>The car has a 5 speed manual transmission and a 3 liter V6 engine. It&#8217;s a lot of fun with the windows and sun roof all open. The back seat seats 3, or 2 very comfortably, and there is plenty of trunk space. Definitely enough for 4 people going on a weekend trip, or 3 people going on a week-long camping vacation. It also gets quite decent gas mileage.</p>
<p>You can see lots of pictures at <a href="http://www.casualhacker.net/forsale/maxima/">http://www.casualhacker.net/forsale/maxima/</a> .</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, e-mail <a href="mailto:tim@casualhacker.net">tim@casualhacker.net</a> or call 805-566-3706.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Price</th>
<td>$3,195 or best offer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Mileage</th>
<td>163,000 miles</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Transmission</th>
<td>5 speed manual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Smog Test</th>
<td>Passed just two months ago on 4/14/2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Features</th>
<td>Power Sun Roof, Floor Mats, Air Conditioning, Power Steering, Power Windows, Power Door Locks, Tilt Wheel, Cruise Control, AM/FM Stereo, Cassette, Single Compact Disc, Premium Sound, Dual Front Air Bags, ABS (4-Wheel), Leather, Dual Power Seats, Rear Spoiler, Alloy Wheels, Alarm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Defects</th>
<td>Broken tachometer. Minor windshield chip (over a year old, not increasing in size). Broken stereo display (sound is fine). Power locks sometimes lock themselves. Antenna doesn&#8217;t retract all the way. Broken front right fog light.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Color</th>
<td>Black, with black leather interior</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Engine</th>
<td>3.0L V6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Drivetrain</th>
<td>Front wheel drive</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Gas Mileage</th>
<td>The official numbers are 25 MPG highway, 19 MPG in the city, 21 MPG &#8220;combined.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/06/maxima/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phun: Clock with Balls</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/02/phun-clock-with-balls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/02/phun-clock-with-balls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/02/phun-clock-with-balls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So about a week ago I discovered Phun, a 2D physics sandbox. It&#8217;s an awesome toy. You should check it out. Anyway, I made one of those ball clocks. It was a lot more work than I thought it would be, but at least it&#8217;s done and I can stop obsessing about it. (Well, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So about a week ago I discovered <a href="http://www.acc.umu.se/~emilk/">Phun</a>, a 2D physics sandbox. It&#8217;s an awesome toy. You should check it out. Anyway, I made one of those ball clocks. It was a lot more work than I thought it would be, but at least it&#8217;s done and I can stop obsessing about it. (Well, it does get stuck occasionally so maybe I can&#8217;t. And I wonder if I could do the same thing with water. How about a thing that builds a wall and knocks it over? So many possibilities&#8230;)<br />
I just put up a video on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L70aUEPRQyU">YouTube</a> (after spending a really long time figuring out how to encode one the right way). You however, are lucky, and can see a <a href="/movies/clock_with_balls.ogg">good quality version</a> of this video. You might need to install <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/">VLC</a> to play it though. If you already have Phun installed, you can also download <a href="/data/clock_with_balls_1_0.zip">the .phn file</a>. Just unzip and drop it in your Scenes folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2008/02/phun-clock-with-balls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaaaaag</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/10/aaaaaag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/10/aaaaaag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/10/aaaaaag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN: the network that keeps on giving. I don&#8217;t know what it is, but their Monday Night Football overlay guys are messing up pretty regularly this year. And now that I&#8217;ve got a thing going, I can&#8217;t stop of course.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/Aaaaaag.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="Aaaaaag" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/Aaaaaag.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>ESPN: the network that keeps on giving. I don&#8217;t know what it is, but their Monday Night Football overlay guys are messing up pretty regularly this year. And now that I&#8217;ve got a thing going, I can&#8217;t stop of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/10/aaaaaag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaaag</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/aaaag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/aaaag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/aaaag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know what it is, but I just love seeing the ESPN guys hit the wrong button or whatever it is they do to get these busted stat overlays. Maybe there needs to be a 10s delay so somebody can override them with the live feed whenever this happens. In related news, Tony Kornheiser [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/Aaaag.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="Aaaag" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/Aaaag.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>I don&#8217;t know what it is, but I just love seeing the ESPN guys hit the wrong button or whatever it is they do to get these busted stat overlays. Maybe there needs to be a 10s delay so somebody can override them with the live feed whenever this happens. In related news, Tony Kornheiser is still really annoying and Charles Barkley should take his place. Ron Jaworski does a good job. I hope he stays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/aaaag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco 48ers</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/san-francisco-48ers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/san-francisco-48ers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/san-francisco-48ers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like ESPN is adding an opening-night screwup as a special feature of their Monday night football coverage. Here&#8217;s what they did this year.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/48ers.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="48ers" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/48ers.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>Looks like ESPN is adding an <a href="http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/name-lastname/">opening-night screwup</a> as a special feature of their Monday night football coverage. Here&#8217;s what they did this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/09/san-francisco-48ers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WorldMark (formerly Trendwest) Sales Pitch</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/06/worldmark-formerly-trendwest-sales-pitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/06/worldmark-formerly-trendwest-sales-pitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/06/worldmark-formerly-trendwest-sales-pitch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be long and boring. I&#8217;m just writing it up so that other people who get a similar offer will be able to read what or experience was.
A while ago we got a message on our answering machine telling us to call back so we could claim our prize, although they didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be long and boring. I&#8217;m just writing it up so that other people who get a similar offer will be able to read what or experience was.</p>
<p>A while ago we got a message on our answering machine telling us to call back so we could claim our prize, although they didn&#8217;t mention what the prize was. Skeptically, I called back. I was told that I had one a trip for 2 to Las Vegas. All my wife and I had to do was go collect our prize, which would involve driving to their nearest center (about 1 hour), and then sitting through a 90 minute sales presentation. I figured getting a trip (flights plus two nights in a hotel) to Vegas was worth that hassle, so I scheduled an appointment.</p>
<p>A week or two later we went straight from work to the presentation, which was in what looked like an office building. The Trendwest lobby was made to feel like a hotel. We signed in, and were quickly met by our sales rep. I don&#8217;t remember his name, but let&#8217;s call him Al. Al took us to an open room which was set up a lot like a restaurant, where several people were already getting acquainted with their sales rep. Al directed us to his table, where the three of us sat down and talked a bit. He tried to figure out what we like and dislike, while we tried to figure out what he was up to.</p>
<p>After about 10 minutes it was time for the presentation. We all went into another room where they had a video projector set up, and a presenter walked in to tell us what this night was all about. The presentation went something like this: People like timeshares because it&#8217;s cheaper than staying in hotels. Timeshares aren&#8217;t flexible, though. So Trendwest has something better. They build hotels all over the world, and sell part ownership. That part ownership gets you a certain number of points, which renew every year, that you can use to stay in those hotels. So basically you buy an investment in real estate, that gets you free hotel stays every year.</p>
<p>After the presentation we returned to Al&#8217;s table, where he tried to convince us to buy in. He used pretty standard sales techniques. We weren&#8217;t too keen on spending $10,000 that night, but that would mean forgoing the that-night-only offer. He offered us some more perks when we weren&#8217;t buying, but we still weren&#8217;t interested. I was trying to figure out how much hotel stay I could buy if I invested $10,000 in a 60/40 stock/bond index fund. In most cases you can draw 4% off that, inflation-adjusted, forever. So that&#8217;s $400 you can spend every year, instead of some number of points that can only be used at certain hotels. Al either couldn&#8217;t or didn&#8217;t want to understand that. A big selling point was that we were buying a lifestyle change. That buy spending this money once, we&#8217;d enjoy a higher quality of vacations, and we&#8217;d take more of them.</p>
<p>After a while Al gave up and called in the floor manager, let&#8217;s call him Bill. Bill gave us another offer and ran some numbers with us. That didn&#8217;t work out so well since most of the time when we vacation we camp and don&#8217;t stay in hotels at all. Since we weren&#8217;t buying that, we were sent off to Charlie to collect our prize. But before that happened, Charlie wondered if we&#8217;d like to take advantage of a special trial offer. The deal was  that we&#8217;d get 6,000 vacation credits (which is 5-7 days, but only usable at a subset of all the resorts) for $695. After some debate, we decided it would be nice to do that, just to do a real hotel vacation for a change. We then surprised Charlie by paying the full amount right there. (Really, it&#8217;s kind of scary that anybody would finance that kind of purchase.) Halfway through signing the papers, he mentioned that this also included sitting through another presentation once we were at the resort. I was kind of annoyed that he didn&#8217;t mention that before, but we went ahead anyway. Finally, we did get the coupon for our Vegas vacation.</p>
<p>At home, some research on <a href="http://search-completed.ebay.com/search/search.dll?GetResult&#038;sacat=-1&#038;ftrt=1&#038;coaction=compare&#038;fsop=1&#038;_trksid=m37&#038;sadis=200&#038;from=R10&#038;sargn=-1&#038;sofocus=so&#038;copagenum=1&#038;fpos=93013&#038;saprclo=&#038;sabfmts=1&#038;fis=2&#038;sbrftog=1&#038;saobfmts=insif&#038;satitle=trendwest&#038;saprchi=&#038;coentrypage=search&#038;ftrv=1&#038;guest=1">Ebay </a> shows that we could&#8217;ve bought 10,000 one-time use credits for $660, so we paid about 50% extra by buying from the pusher. Perhaps the smart thing would&#8217;ve been to call and cancel (we had 7 days to do that, according to our contract), but we didn&#8217;t. So now we&#8217;ve got a week&#8217;s of hotel time that we fully intend to enjoy.</p>
<p>Our Vegas vacation came with various limitations (mostly that it had to be all during the week), so I called to reserve a time during Danielle&#8217;s summer vacation. That was no problem, but I did learn on that phone call that the airport we&#8217;re flying out of would be chosen by the travel provider, and we would be told about 2 weeks before departure what that would be. Since the airport list included several LA airports and San Diego, I was not happy about that. It takes a long time to drive to San Diego from here. It&#8217;s probably faster to drive to Vegas directly. Anyway, we can always decide not to fly if we end up in that boat.</p>
<p>It all seemed set, but just recently we got a piece of paper in the mail saying that we had to send in a check for $94 to cover taxes and fees. This is the first time those were ever mentioned so I&#8217;m pretty annoyed. We will not be taking the Vegas vacation. If I need to pay $94 to get something, then it&#8217;s not free.</p>
<p>So in the end we were promised that we would get a free Vegas vacation but we came away with spending $695 on a different vacation, and no Vegas vacation. If you get a similar offer, I recommend you just ignore it and keep enjoying your life. If you do decide to go, well, now you know a little bit more of what to expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2007/06/worldmark-formerly-trendwest-sales-pitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSP Quick-Start Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/tsp-quick-start-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/tsp-quick-start-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/tsp-quick-start-guide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article will try to give you a basic understanding of the TSP, and how I would use it if I had access to one. Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. Always do your own research.
The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) is a government retirement program available to people who work for the government. Money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article will try to give you a basic understanding of the TSP, and how I would use it if I had access to one. Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. Always do your own research.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.tsp.gov/">Thrift Savings Plan</a> (TSP) is a government retirement program available to people who work for the government. Money you save into your TSP is not taxed until you take it out, and earnings of your TSP aren&#8217;t taxed either. Assuming you are in the 15% tax bracket, that means when you save $1,000 into your TSP, your actual pay only goes down by $850 and not the full $1,000. When your TSP account earns $1,000 in one year, that entire $1,000 is added to your account. This is a huge advantage over saving money in a taxable account and the main reason to use this program. Another benefit of the TSP account is that it has some of the lowest fees available anywhere. Fees are calculated as a percentage of money you have invested, and is the one sure thing about investing. Your returns are unpredictable, but the fees are guaranteed. A 0.25% fee is considered good for a typical mutual fund, and fees as high as 1% are common. By comparison the TSP fees range from 0.04% to 0.05%.</p>
<p>Once your money is in a TSP account, it can be put into 5 different core funds. Each fund has a different expected volatility and return. Volatility describes how much a fund&#8217;s value will go up and down. Return tells you how fast your account will grow in the long term. Funds with a higher return also have higher volatility, so you can&#8217;t just put all your money in the fund with the highest return. A volatile fund might gain 10% tomorrow, but lose 20% the day after. If you are going to retire soon, a volatile fund is not your best choice, and you should pick a less volatile fund (which also has a lower return). If your retirement is a long way away, you can pick a more volatile fund which, in the long term, will have a higher return.</p>
<p>The core funds available in your TSP are (in order from lowest to highest return and volatility):</p>
<table border=1>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-gfund.pdf">G Fund</a></td>
<td>Money in this fund is lent to the U.S. Government. They&#8217;re good for it. This fund should never go down in value.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-ffund.pdf">F Fund</a></td>
<td>Money in this fund is lent to the U.S. Government and reputable companies. Some of these loans will fall through, but that doesn&#8217;t happen very often.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-cfund.pdf">C Fund</a></td>
<td>Money in this fund is given to large and medium-sized U.S. companies by buying their stock. In exchange this companies will try really hard to increase in value and give you dividends each year. They&#8217;re not always succesful at this, and in a recession the value of this fund might go down several years in a row. The long term return for this kind of investment is quite good.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-sfund.pdf">S Fund</a></td>
<td>This fund is the same as the C Fund, except your money is given to small and medium-sized U.S. companies instead of large and medium-sized U.S. companies. The long term return tends to be a bit better than the C Fund, but again the volatility is higher because smaller companies are more likely to go out of business.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-ifund.pdf">I Fund</a></td>
<td>The same as the C Fund again, except the lucky companies are ones in developed countries that aren&#8217;t the U.S. There is the risk that these companies go out of business, and currency exchange rates add an extra layer of potential return and volatility. The return and volatility of this fund are similar to that of the S Fund.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>You can divide your money up between those funds in any way you want. The further you are away from retirement the more volatility you should choose, because the more volatile funds also have the highest long-term returns. So when you&#8217;re young you should be mostly in the I, S, and C funds. As you get older, you should change your fund selection so that more of your money should be in the G and F funds. That requires you to do some work every year, and it also requires you to figure out what a reasonable allocation is each time. To save you from this hassle, your TSP account has <a href="http://www.tsp.gov/rates/fundsheet-lfunds.pdf">L funds</a>.</p>
<p>There is an L fund for every decade you might want to retire in. If you&#8217;re retiring in 2035 or later, the L 2040 is the fund for you. Currently it has money in (from most to least) the C fund, I fund, S fund, F fund, and G fund. As time goes on it will slowly change its allocation until, when it&#8217;s time for you to retire, it will have money in (from most to least) the G fund, F fund, C fund, I fund, and S fund. This is exactly what you want, and once you&#8217;ve set all your money to be contributed to the L fund you won&#8217;t every have to worry about it again. I recommend you move all the money you already have into the appropriate L fund, and change your contributions so that all the money you contribute also goes into that same L fund.</p>
<p>How much you should save in your TSP account mainly depends on how much you can afford. More is better. There is a limit ($15,000 for 2006), and reaching that limit every year would be ideal. You should start out at a contribution rate that seems reasonable right now. Then every time you get a raise, increase your contribution rate enough that you still see some of that raise, but that at least a third of it goes to your retirement savings. So if you get a 3% raise, increase your contribution rate by 1 or 2 percentage points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/tsp-quick-start-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Name Lastname</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/name-lastname/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/name-lastname/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/name-lastname/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN paid $65,000,000 for the rights to the season&#8217;s first Monday night game, and sent 150 people out to cover it. You&#8217;d think that they would have figured out how to use their fancy computer system before the game. Schadenfreude is great&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/name_lastname.jpg"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="name_lastname" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/name_lastname.jpg?s=240x240" /></a>ESPN paid $65,000,000 for the rights to the season&#8217;s first Monday night game, and sent 150 people out to cover it. You&#8217;d think that they would have figured out how to use their fancy computer system before the game. Schadenfreude is great&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/09/name-lastname/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snorkelling</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/08/snorkelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/08/snorkelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/08/snorkelling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I was talking to Tom at work who mentioned that there&#8217;s a great place to go snorkelling in Carpinteria, which is easily reachable by kayak. I pressed him some more about the place, and figured it wouldn&#8217;t be too bad to swim to from a nearby beach. Turns out to be about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week I was talking to Tom at work who mentioned that there&#8217;s a great place to go snorkelling in Carpinteria, which is easily reachable by kayak. I pressed him some more about the place, and figured it wouldn&#8217;t be too bad to swim to from a nearby beach. Turns out to be about a .2 miles, which isn&#8217;t bad with fins and a snorkel. The surf report said the water is so flat you should go kayak instead, which makes the conditions perfect for snorkelling. So this morning Danielle and I headed out to the beach.</p>
<p>We could see the kelp from the beach (and in fact there were several kayakers there). The swim looked kind of further than I thought, but we set out anyway. The water was very clear. We could clearly see the sandy bottom where the water was as much as 4 feet deep. Soon thereafter we lost sight of the bottom, and swam with nothing but the water to look at. We passed a solitary kelp plant where Danielle saw a good sized bat ray, but I didn&#8217;t. After some more swimming we hit the kelp forest itself. Most of the bottom here seems to be rocky, and in the shallowest parts about 8 feet deep. In those places you could make out the white stuff on the bottom from the surface (shells, mostly), which is enough to tell you where to go down. We saw clams, urchnis, anemones, and other spineless critters that Danielle knows what they are. There were a fair amount of fish around. I saw at least a school of top smelt, so kind of perch, a small kelp fish, and a school of something else that Danielle didn&#8217;t see. (If Danielle doesn&#8217;t see it, that means I don&#8217;t know what it is, since she is my ocean life reference.) Overall it was a great place to snorkel for being so close to home. Definitely not as nice as some of the spots at the islands, but fun nonetheless.</p>
<p>Danielle said she was cooling down (my wetsuit fits a lot better than hers) so we started going back. While still in the kelp forest, I saw a big fish come into view about 5 feet below me. It just kept getting bigger, and when I saw the first 4 feet of it I did a double take and realized it was actually a seal I was looking at. Excitedly I told Danielle, but she had missed it. Then the seal popped its head up about 20 feet away, so we swam towards it. When we got pretty close it went down, so I chased after it. I did see it swim a bit under water, but a seal could outswim me with both flippers and its tail tied behind it&#8217;s back so after about 5s it was gone again. This repeated quite a few more times. The seal would pop up its head, and we&#8217;d swim towards it. Sometimes one of us would go under before we reached the seal. When that happened the seal would go under also, trying to see where we went. If you kept swimming under water you&#8217;d meet the seal after a few seconds, and it would act surprised, arch its back and take off int he other direction. It was very cute. At one point Danielle got with 3 feet of the seal&#8217;s head before it dove to safety. Another time Danielle and I were looking for the seal, when it turned around it was right at our feet, sniffing (or so it looked) the tips of my fins. It was really awesome to encounter such a beautiful, playful and wild animal.</p>
<p>All good things come to an end, and we had to head back lest Danielle got too cold. I caught a glimpse of (presumably) the same bat ray that Danielle saw on the way out, and then before I knew we were back at the beach. We were in the water for about an hour. If you&#8217;re in the area and the water is calm, I highly recommend snorkelling around 34°23&#8242;41.03&#8243;N 119°32&#8242;9.94&#8243;W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/08/snorkelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flightgear</title>
		<link>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/07/flightgear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/07/flightgear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 02:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/07/flightgear/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I stumbled upon Flightgear, a completely free flight simulator which is available for most platforms. It comes with a dozen aircraft (including some helicopters), and with scenery for the San Francisco Bay area. You can download more scenery for anywhere in the world. If you&#8217;re so inclined, all the tools to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/flightgear01.png"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="flightgear01.png" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/flightgear01.png?s=240x240" /></a>A few weeks ago I stumbled upon <a href="http://www.flightgear.org/">Flightgear</a>, a completely free flight simulator which is available for most platforms. It comes with a dozen aircraft (including some helicopters), and with scenery for the San Francisco Bay area. You can download more scenery for anywhere in the world. If you&#8217;re so inclined, all the tools to edit the scenery are available for download as well, so you can add any amount of detail to your local area. For instance, I added the oil platforms in the Santa Barbara Channel. Then I submitted these changes back to the scenery maintainer, so that with the next scenery release those oil platforms will show up for everybody flying in that area.</p>
<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/flightgear02.png"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="right" alt="flightgear02.png" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/flightgear02.png?s=240x240" /></a>Flightgear is much more of a real simulator than a game, and since I discovered it I&#8217;ve spent almost as much time reading about flight as I&#8217;ve spent actually flying. The first thing you learn is that single prop airplanes <a href="http://www.auf.asn.au/groundschool/umodule11.html#tophenomena">pull to the left</a> when rolling down the runway. Lucky for you, flightgear does not simulate different surfaces so taking from the grass is no problem. The traditional &#8220;full power, pull back on the yoke&#8221; will get you in the air, albeit with a significant lean to the left. If you&#8217;re me, you then point the plane where you want to go, and hope it works out. After more reading and more practice I can now take off reasonably well and my landings are getting fairly smooth, although not always on the runway.</p>
<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/flightgear03.png"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="left" alt="flightgear03.png" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/flightgear03.png?s=240x240" /></a>The rest of the time is spent checking out scenery, figuring out how the autopilot works (the best docs I found were written by the manufacturer), and learning about the million other details you need to know to fly an airplane. The great thing about the simulator is that you can learn the hard way, and it&#8217;s OK. For instance, I had a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_310">C310</a> quite literally fall out of the sky when I was flying to the top of Mount Rainier. The engine just suddenly cut off, I think because I didn&#8217;t lean the fuel mixture like you&#8217;re supposed to. Another time I took the 737-300 for a flight, which involved hitting the ocean. The 737-300 is really hard to fly. It&#8217;s much less stable than you&#8217;d think, and because it&#8217;s so powerful you can drop from 500ft to sealevel before you know it. On top of that, the nose prevents you from seeing the horizon.</p>
<p><a href="/cgi-bin/picindex.py/album/blog/flightgear04.png"><img vspace="8" hspace="15" align="right" alt="flightgear04.png" src="/cgi-bin/resize.py/album/blog/flightgear04.png?s=240x240" /></a>If none of this is interesting to you, then Flightgear is probably not for you. But if you are interested in aviation then this is truly a great program. The last flight simulator I played before this one was Flight Simulator 2 so I can&#8217;t compare Flightgear to the current state of the art. My impression is that its flight model is as good as any other. There are somewhat less planes available, and I haven&#8217;t found any areas that have detailed scenery. On the other hand, it&#8217;s free, constantly improving, and you can extend it any way you want if you have the skill. Give it a try, you&#8217;ve got nothing to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.casualhacker.net/blog/2006/07/flightgear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
